Adjunct Faculty, Other Initiatives
• PhD in Biodiversity Management, Durrell Institute of Conservation and Ecology (DICE), University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
• MSc in Wildlife Sciences, Wildlife Institute of India, Dehradun
Abishek is a population ecologist with Panthera’s Tiger program.
He is broadly interested in population ecology, law enforcement monitoring, measuring conservation effectiveness, and conservation decision making. Currently, his work involves developing metrics for measuring short-term impacts of conservation actions in tiger conservation landscapes.
Email: aharihar[at]panthera.org, aharihar[at]ncf-india.org
- Journal Article2019Protected areas and biodiversity conservation in India. Biol. Cons. 237: 114-124.Biological Conservation 237: 114-124.Download
PDF, 1.46 MB
Three well-supported generalizations in conservation biology are that developing tropical countries will experience the greatest biodiversity declines in the near future, they are some of the least studied areas in the world, and in these regions especially, protection requires local community support. We assess these generalizations in an evaluation of protected areas in India. The 5% of India officially protected covers most ecoregions and protected areas have been an important reason why India has suffered no documented species extinctions in the past 70 years. India has strong legislation favouring conservation, government investment focused on 50 Tiger Reserves, and government compensation schemes that facilitate local support, all of which brighten future prospects. However, many protected areas are too small to maintain a full complement of species, making connectivity and species use of buffer zones a crucial issue. Conservation success and challenges vary across regions according to their development status. In less developed areas, notably the biodiverse northeast Himalaya, protected areas maintaining the highest biodiversity result from locally-focused efforts by dedicated individuals. Across India, we demonstrate considerable opportunities to increase local income through eco- tourism. Our evaluation confirms a lack of data, increasing threats, and the importance of local support. Research on biodiversity in buffer zones, development of long-term monitoring schemes, and assessment of cash and conservation benefits from tourism are in particular need. For policy makers, two main goals should be the development of monitoring plans for‘eco-sensitive zones’around protected areas, and a strong emphasis on preserving established protected areas.